Your original block on the Tardis wiki (by Amorkuz) was infinite, but you appealed to SOTO, who removed your block. SOTO specifically said that due to your previous behavior, "you will not find the same degree of lenience if this does become an issue."
Even though you removed the poster's vandalism, you posted on his talk page that the only reason you opposed the vandalism was because it wasn't funny. You then proceeded to create a page (and an accompanying talk page) where you planned to list examples of previous vandalism that you found funny and that if someone plans to vandalize the wiki, they should try to be funny.
My only conclusion is that you were encouraging vandalism on the wiki. If you will notice, I gave you a one-month block, despite the fact that I felt your behavior deserved another infinite block. Please keep in mind when you come back that we have enough trouble with vandalism on the wiki without you actively encouraging it.
Hi, I think there's been a misunderstanding. I was rearranging the images on the First Doctor page, replacing less crucial moments with images depicting more important moments with images not used elsewhere on the wiki. You caught me in the middle of the process, and seemed to come to the conclusion the images where to stay, when I was actually in the middle of removing all but one from each section when I received your block.
Quick question though; why do so many other articles on the wiki have multiple images per subsection if this is policy? The other Doctor pages have at least two images in their personality section, which was why I re-added the images to that section only.